TB NETBible YUN-IBR Ref. Silang Nama Gambar Himne

Imamat 6:29

Konteks
6:29 Any male among the priests may eat it. It is most holy.¹

Imamat 7:32

Konteks
7:32 The right thigh you must give as a contribution offering² to the priest from your peace offering sacrifices.

Imamat 19:4

Konteks
19:4 Do not turn to idols,³ and you must not make for yourselves gods of cast metal. I am the Lord your God.

Imamat 27:17

Konteks
27:17 If he consecrates his field in the jubilee year,⁴ the conversion value will stand,

Imamat 27:22

Konteks

27:22 “‘If he consecrates to the Lord a field he has purchased,⁵ which is not part of his own landed property,

[6:29] ¹tn Heb “holiness of holinesses [or holy of holies] it is” (also in 7:1).

[7:32] ²tn Older English versions (e.g., KJV, ASV) translate this Hebrew term (תְּרוּמָה, tÿrumah) “heave offering,” derived from the idea of “to raise, to lift” found in the verbal root (cf. NAB “a raised offering”). “Contribution offering” is a better English rendering because it refers to something “taken out from” (i.e., “lifted up from”; cf. the Hebrew term הֵרִים (herim) in, e.g., Lev 2:9; 4:8, etc.) the offering as a special contribution to the specific priest who presided over the offering procedures in any particular instance (see the next verse and R. E. Averbeck, NIDOTTE 4:335-37). Cf. TEV “as a special contribution”; NCV, NLT “as a gift.”

[19:4] ³sn Regarding the difficult etymology and meaning of the term for “idols” (אֱלִילִים, ’elilim), see B. A. Levine, Leviticus (JPSTC), 126; J. E. Hartley, Leviticus (WBC), 304; N. H. Snaith, Leviticus and Numbers (NBC), 89; and Judith M. Hadley, NIDOTTE 1:411. It appears to be a diminutive play on words with אֵל (’el, “god; God”) and, perhaps at the same time, recalls a common Semitic word for “worthless; weak; powerless; nothingness.” Snaith suggests a rendering of “worthless godlings.”

[27:17] ⁴tn Heb “from the year of the jubilee.” For the meaning of “jubilee,” see the note on Lev 25:10 above.

[27:22] ⁵tn Heb “his field of purchase,” which is to be distinguished from his own ancestral “landed property” (cf. v. 16 above).